RSPO, Greenpeace and WWF agree that the palm oil industry needs to be transformed

 

 

The debate was hosted and moderated by Rhett Butler, founder of Mongabay.com and featured panellists Bustar Maitar, head of the Indonesia Forest Campaign at Greenpeace, Adam Harrison, Senior Policy Advisor at WWF and Darrel Webber, Secretary General of the RSPO. During the debate, all panellists answered questions submitted by the public through Twitter and by email. 

 

The Indonesian haze in the summer of 2013 raised important questions about the commitment of the palm oil industry to stop deforestation. The forest fires spiked a debate on transparency within the palm oil supply chain. Panellists discussed the difficulties in obtaining credible data to assess the involvement of companies in the forest fires and the importance of not only grower members but also processors and traders for the oil they buy from other companies. Subsequently, questions were raised about enforcing compliance of RSPO members. Bustar Maitar: “Forest fires have been a longstanding problem in Indonesia. Stopping the fires is not easy – the Indonesian government has started to implement measures to stop the fires but it is important to deal with the problem for the long term by stopping the clearance of peatland and conversion of forests. RSPO members should dedicate efforts to that.”

 

Adam Harrison: “Being merely a member of the RSPO is no longer enough – industry players need to take action to move the entire supply chain to sustainable palm oil. The WWF Scorecard is one way to publicise the progress members are making and reveal where the industry is falling short.” 

 

Darrel Webber echoed: “Becoming a RSPO member means that all activities of that company are put under a microscope which fuels the debate about compliance with the RSPO. While the RSPO was scrutinising its implicated member companies for reported hot spots covering approximately one million hectares of land – for which all its members were cleared except for one case which has been escalated to the complaints procedure, it is critical there is considerable attention given to the other 9 million hectares of land belonging to non RSPO members. The haze was an opportune time for stakeholders around the world to push the sustainability agenda. It is worth analysing if this was achieved.”

 

Palm oil sustainability has been a topic of intense debate – upstream and downstream players of the palm oil supply chain are pointing at each other to take the first step to become sustainable. During the debate, WWF stated that the transformation of the industry is a shared responsibility of all players in the palm oil supply chain, Adam Harrison: “Palm oil is a high yielding crop which can have a sustainable future and guarantee food security in the long term. However, for this to happen we need a credible and robust certification system.” 

 

Greenpeace pointed at the importance of the involvement of government and authorities to identify the key drivers of deforestation but stressed that the real responsibility to maintain the integrity of our environment rests with the industry: “Companies need to look at their entire supply chain to ensure they are fully sustainable. Those who are not doing the right thing will start to feel the economic impact as more and more industry players are adopting sourcing policies that require their suppliers to be 100% sustainable and commit to zero deforestation.”

 

Although the benefits of RSPO certification was recognised by all panellists, Greenpeace argues there is a need to move beyond the RSPO standard. Bustar Maitar: “The position of Greenpeace is not to ban palm oil and we are not against the RSPO. However, we believe more needs to be done and the industry needs to go beyond the RSPO standard to guarantee zero deforestation. With the newly founded Palm Oil Innovation Group – which mostly consists of RSPO members – we are seeking to set an example for the industry and show the world it can be done.” The Palm Oil Innovation Group (POIG) is a grouping of producers and NGOs who are committed to building on the RSPO as a basis to break their links with deforestation. The POIG has four producer company members and four NGOs including Greenpeace and WWF. POIG is not a substitute for the RSPO, but rather a platform for progressive members of the RSPO to demonstrate innovative ways of compliance with RSPO standards as well as additional issues not covered by the RSPO such as zero deforestation and local community food security.

 

Darrel Webber reaffirmed that the RSPO is a solution committed to continuous improvement and urged that immediate action is needed: “We cannot afford to wait until we have found a perfect solution and need to act now. The RSPO offers the industry a basis and is currently the only global and credible standard for sustainable palm oil. Our aim is to raise the bar for the entire industry – we applaud those who want to move ahead but it is essential to get all players in the supply chain on board to achieve real industry-wide change.” Panellists also discussed other new standards such as MSPO (Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil) and ISPO (Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil). There was agreement that these standards facilitate faster adoption of the industry at large to sustainable practices as a step by step approach so that producers can progress more easily in accommodating international standards. 

 

In addition to solving the problems on the ground in producing countries, it is of paramount importance to promote sustainable palm oil in consumer markets as well, agreed all panellists; Darrel Webber: “We need to solve what we can right now and not wait for China and India to move and embrace sustainable practices – this is just an excuse for inaction.” Panellists pointed at the power of multinational companies present in all markets and who have the capacity to take the lead and drive market transformation.

 

RSPO and WWF also confirmed the economic benefits of becoming RSPO-certified. Adam Harrison: “RSPO certification enables growers to manage their plantations much more efficiently and have better control over their operations which leads to increased yields and consequently lower costs and increased revenues.” Bustar Maitar from Greenpeace summarized what is really at stake: “What we are looking for is the balance between ecology and economic growth.”

 

Consumers can play a role in obtaining this balance, Adam Harrison: “A first action for consumers to take is to look for products which have the RSPO Trademark. Individuals do have the power to contact brands and retailers and ask them what they are doing to source sustainable palm oil – consumers can make a difference by demanding companies to buy certified sustainable palm oil.”

 

The online debate was viewed by more than 100 people during the live broadcast and will remain accessible to view on: http://www.mongabay.com/palm-oil-debate.html and on RSPO’s YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBwTIP9Hc0k. The debate has since its live broadcast been watched by more than 1,500 viewers.

For further information, kindly contact:
Contact for RSPO Secretariat: Joycelyn Lee Communications Director T:+603-22012053 [email protected]	Contact for Europe: Giovanni Colombo Hill+Knowlton Strategies T: +32 (0)2 231 50 19 [email protected]	Contact for Indonesia: Desi Kusumadewi RSPO Indonesia Director T: +62 21 5794 0222 [email protected]
Contact for India:  Arneeta Vasudeva IPAN Hill & Knowlton,  T: +91-124-4967316 [email protected]	Contact for China: Peter Headden Hill & Knowlton T: (86 10) 5861 7597 [email protected]